Working in private equity, I see firsthand how quickly new robotics and tech become outdated, especially in export-focused industries. It’s a constant cycle of innovation and replacement. This got me reflecting on the Buddhist idea of impermanence the notion that nothing is permanent and change is the only constant. It feels eerily relevant when a product line is phased out almost as soon as it hits the market.
I’m curious how others reconcile this philosophical perspective with the practical demands of a global economy built on rapid tech turnover. Does embracing impermanence make it easier to adapt, or does it highlight a deeper tension between sustainable growth and planned obsolescence? Would love to hear any thoughts or reading recommendations on this intersection.